Since 1989 28 bench trials 9 jury trials 17 appeals 23 USPTO trial proceedings

(917) 297-9852

Patent services

From a first search to an issued patent

You can start with us at any point — a quick search before you commit, a full application, or a rescue on an application someone else filed and abandoned. Every engagement begins with a flat-fee quote you approve in writing.

Most common filing

Utility patent applications

A utility patent covers how something works — a machine, a process, a manufactured article, a composition of matter, or an improvement to any of them. It's the strongest and most commercially useful form of patent protection, and it's the bulk of what we file.

The document has two halves that do very different jobs. The specification teaches the invention in enough detail that a skilled engineer could reproduce it. The claims — usually a page or two at the end — define the legal boundary of what you own. Claims that are too narrow are easy to design around; claims that are too broad get rejected over prior art. Finding the line between those is the craft.

A utility patent lasts 20 years from your earliest non-provisional filing date, subject to maintenance fees at 3.5, 7.5, and 11.5 years after issue.

What's included

  • Invention disclosure interview with the attorney who will draft it
  • Full specification, background, and detailed description
  • Independent and dependent claim set drafted for real-world scope
  • Formal patent drawings prepared to USPTO standards
  • Inventor declaration, IDS, and entity-status filings
  • Electronic filing and filing-receipt review
  • Docketing of every downstream deadline

Typical timeline: 4–8 weeks from disclosure to filing.

Typical fee: $7,000–$14,000 plus USPTO fees. See the fee breakdown.

Fastest path to filed

Provisional patent applications

A provisional application secures a filing date and the right to say "patent pending" without starting the examination process. It's never examined and never becomes a patent on its own. It buys you twelve months to develop the product, test the market, talk to investors, or raise the money for a full application — and you can claim its filing date when you file the non-provisional.

Here's the part inventors get wrong, and it's expensive: a provisional only protects what it actually describes. If you file three rushed pages and your real invention turns out to be in the details you left out, you don't get priority for those details. We draft provisionals with close to the same rigor as a full application, because a year later that document either holds or it doesn't.

The twelve-month deadline cannot be extended (in many cases). Miss it and the provisional may expire — and if you disclosed the invention publicly in the meantime, your own disclosure could now be prior art against you.

A provisional makes sense when

  • The design is still changing week to week
  • You need patent pending status for investor or customer conversations
  • A trade show, launch, or pitch is imminent
  • You want to test demand before committing to full costs
  • Budget is tight this quarter but the idea can't wait

Skip straight to non-provisional when

  • The invention is settled and documented
  • You want the examination clock running now
  • A competitor is visibly working in the same space

Typical fee: $2,500–$4,500 plus USPTO fees.

Appearance & ornamentation

Design patents

A design patent protects the way a product looks — its shape, surface ornamentation, and visual character — rather than how it functions. The claim is carried almost entirely by the drawings, which makes drawing quality the whole ballgame.

Inventors routinely underestimate these. Design patents are cheaper, issue much faster (often in about a year), and are genuinely effective against the most common real-world problem: a competitor who copies your product's appearance closely enough that customers can't tell them apart. For consumer products, packaging, furniture, housings, and user interfaces, a design patent is often the highest-value dollar you'll spend.

Term is 15 years from issue, with no maintenance fees. Many clients file a design and a utility application on the same product to cover both the look and the mechanism.

Well suited to

  • Consumer product shapes and housings
  • Packaging and container design
  • Furniture and fixtures
  • Jewelry, footwear, and apparel details
  • Graphical user interfaces and icons
  • Vehicle and equipment styling

Typical timeline to issue: 12–20 months.

Typical fee: $1,800–$3,000 plus USPTO fees.

Rejections are not the end

Office action responses & prosecution

Filing is the beginning, not the end. Roughly a year after filing, an examiner reviews your application and — in the large majority of cases — rejects every claim. A first office action rejecting everything is a standard opening position, not a judgment on your invention.

Responding is where applications are actually won. We analyze the cited references, amend claims to distinguish them without giving up commercially meaningful scope, and argue the law. Where it will move things faster, we request an examiner interview and talk it through directly — a thirty-minute conversation often resolves what two written rounds could not.

We also take over applications filed by someone else. If you have a pending case that has stalled, gone final, or been abandoned, send us the application number and we'll tell you what options remain.

We handle

  • Non-final and final office action responses
  • Claim amendments and supporting argument
  • Examiner interviews, in person or by video
  • Requests for Continued Examination (RCE)
  • Appeals to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board
  • Continuations, divisionals, and continuations-in-part
  • Petitions to revive an abandoned application

Typical fee: $1,500–$4,000 per response, depending on complexity and the number of rejections raised.

Before you tool up

Freedom-to-operate analysis

Owning a patent and being allowed to sell your product are completely separate questions, and confusing them is one of the most expensive mistakes a company can make. Your patent says others can't copy you. It says nothing about whether someone else's earlier claim reads on what you're about to ship.

A freedom-to-operate analysis searches live, in-force patents whose claims might cover your product, then reads those claims against your actual design element by element. Where there's exposure, we tell you how serious it is and what your options are — design around it, license it, challenge its validity, or accept the risk knowingly.

The timing matters enormously. A design change is nearly free on a whiteboard, expensive after tooling, and catastrophic after launch. This is work worth doing while you're still deciding what to build.

What you'll receive

  • A search of in-force patents and pending applications in your product space
  • Element-by-element claim mapping against your actual design
  • A risk rating for each reference we consider material
  • Specific design-around options where exposure exists
  • Invalidity angles on the references that matter most
  • A call to walk through all of it before you commit

Typical turnaround: 3–5 weeks, depending on how crowded the field is.

Typical fee: $5,000–$15,000. Included as a flagging pass in the Litigation-Ready tier.

No search is exhaustive — applications stay unpublished for eighteen months, so there's always a window nobody outside the USPTO can see. We'll be explicit about what we can and can't know.

Before diligence finds it

Patent portfolio audits

If you already hold patents, you have an asset whose real value you probably haven't tested. An audit reads what you own the way opposing counsel or an acquirer's diligence team would — looking for the weak points rather than admiring the certificates.

We read every claim against the failure modes that actually kill patents: eligibility exposure under Alice, indefinite terms under Nautilus, accidental means-plus-function language under Williamson, scope surrendered during prosecution under Festo, and claim breadth that outruns what the specification taught. You get a plain verdict on each patent: strong, weak, or hollow — and critically, whether it's still fixable.

That last part is time-sensitive. Many defects can be addressed through a continuation, a reissue, or a corrected filing only while the family is still alive. Once everything has issued and the last continuation has gone abandoned, your options narrow sharply.

You'll receive

  • A patent-by-patent strength assessment in plain English
  • Specific vulnerabilities identified, with the doctrine behind each
  • A fixable / not-fixable verdict on every issue we find
  • Continuation and reissue options where they're still open
  • Coverage gaps between your patents and your actual product line
  • A prioritized action list, cheapest and most urgent first

Typical turnaround: 2–4 weeks for a small portfolio.

Typical fee: $2,500–$6,000, depending on portfolio size.

Worth doing if

  • You're raising a round or entertaining acquisition interest
  • Your patents were filed by a low-cost filing service
  • You're about to spend money enforcing one
  • A competitor has appeared in your space
  • You've never had an outside opinion on what you own
Protection beyond the U.S.

International & PCT filing

A U.S. patent is only enforceable in the United States. If you manufacture abroad, sell abroad, or expect competitors to, you need to think about foreign protection early — because the deadline arrives fast.

A PCT international application, filed within twelve months of your first filing, preserves your right to seek patents in over 150 countries and pushes the expensive country-by-country decision out to roughly thirty months from your priority date. It's a way to buy time and information before committing to the serious costs of national filings.

We'll help you decide which countries are worth the spend based on where your market and your manufacturing actually are — usually a much shorter list than inventors first imagine — and refer you to foreign associates in each.

Deadlines that matter

  • 12 months from first filing to file PCT or direct foreign applications
  • 30 months from priority date for national phase entry in most countries
  • Absolute novelty: most countries bar patents on inventions publicly disclosed before filing — with no U.S.-style grace period

If you have publicly disclosed your invention, foreign rights may already be gone even where U.S. rights remain available. Tell us the disclosure date early.

Not sure which one you need?

That's a normal place to start

Most people who contact us can't tell a provisional from a utility application, and there's no reason they should. Describe what you built and we'll tell you which route fits — and what it costs — before you commit to anything.